Once the Sheriff pops the button on the bag, though, it’s all over – no other negotiations can be made. Any deals made are binding, unless they involve future arrangements (such as ‘When I’m Sheriff, I’ll let your bag through for free’). The deliberation here is the key – it will give players the chance to wheedle a deal out of the Sheriff, such as promising coin or goods for not opening their bag, or even offering coin to open a different player’s bag. The Sheriff then eyeballs the would-be merchants and decides, typically with much deliberation, whether to hand the bag back unmolested or inspect it. These will be handed to the Sheriff with an announcement of how many of one type of legal good they contain – for example, ‘This bag contains three apples’. In each round of Sheriff of Nottingham, players will place up to five goods from their hand into felt bags, sealing them with a satisfying ‘click’. Each player has a chance to be the Sheriff twice before the game comes to an end, and the person with the most money at the end wins. On top of that, if the Sheriff inspects a pack and it turns out to contain exactly what the merchant stated, the Sheriff is fined instead. However, the Sheriff is not the most law-abiding of individuals, and the merchants are welcome to try to bribe him with coin or the contents of their packs, if it means sneaking a few indulgences through the gates. Unfortunately for them, they need to bring their goods past the Sheriff of Nottingham himself – and if they are bringing in contraband (or indeed anything at all other than what they claimed), the Sheriff will subject them to a fine. Sheriff of Nottingham is a bluffing and negotiation game where the players are mostly-honest merchants bringing their goods to market. I recommend the game with 4 players if possible as the best middle ground option.Best enjoyed: With 4 or 5 players who want to try to sneak valuable goods past their friends Playing with 3 players, on the other hand, adds an extra round to the game so it doesn’t exactly shorten things. The game tends to drag at times if the Sheriff takes a long time to ask questions, so 5 players can take a while. I feel like if you were in a group of more straight-laced people that wanted to play it normally it could be less exciting, though the strategy and gameplay still appeal to the average player. This caused everyone to be more engaged in the game and the enthusiasm built up as we went. My friends and family are all very outgoing, energetic, and goofy, so when we started playing we immediately turned it into an improv show where everyone put on different accents and asked silly questions to try and get a reaction from the group. I found that this game can be a lot of fun, but how much fun depends on the company you are in. A number of other nuances in how you draw cards and what goods you choose to play add up to a very inventive and interesting game. This means that you can try and smuggle contraband in for big point totals, or you can tell the truth and hope that the Sheriff tries to catch you. If you were truthful about your goods then the Sheriff has to pay you, but if not the extra goods get confiscated and you have to pay the Sheriff. The added twist to this is that every round someone acts as “sheriff” who then can choose to inspect each person’s bag. Everyone then declares what foods he/she put in his/her bag (4 apples, 3 bread, etc.) either truthfully or untruthfully if they have extra foods or “contraband”. The basic mechanic involves drawing cards and choosing what types you want to load into your bag. Sheriff of Nottingham focuses on merchants trying to bring their goods into the city to sell. Luckily enough, the game is based on so much more than bluffing and there are many different types of strategy while playing, so I was able to find a strategy that works for me without too much struggle. So when I opened up Sheriff of Nottingham and realized the game is based around bluffing and misdirection, I was worried I wouldn’t be able to pick it up well. I like to think I am, but looking at it objectively I really don’t have the best poker face.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |